Capitolism

The New Face of Hunger

posted by Te-Ping Chen on 02/27/2008 @ 4:03pm

This week, UN World Food Program issued a bleak warning: In the future, the WFP said, there will be food on the shelves. It's just that many won't be able to afford it.

As food prices have spiked--in some places, by up to 40%--the WFP announced that its $2.9 billion budget is no longer enough to maintain even current food deliveries, much less expand. Last year to take one example, with the rising cost of fuel and food prices, the United States purchased less than half the amount of food aid it did in 2000.

But in the case of the U.S., it doesn't have to be that way. Currently, existing U.S. rules mandate that at least 75% of its food aid be grown and packaged in the United States (that is, benefit U.S. producers) before being shipped across the sea. Accordingly, the cost in transport--particularly as oil prices have risen--is extraordinary. (A recent GAO study reported shipping costs account for 65% of total program expenditures for the largest U.S. food emergency program.) These days as the UN scrambles to ration food, as the Bush administration has proposed (and Congress has rejected), it'd be a much more charitable gesture for the U.S. to step up what it buys locally--where it's needed.

Comments (2)

  1. not to demand that even our "charity" in reality be about subsidizing corporate agribusiness further.----Posted by ZERO 02/27/2008 @ 4:14pm

    Occasionally even a blind squirrel finds a nut....

    in this case, ZERO has a point. Wouldn't an increase in food bought by the US for the UN mean....more money for Archer-Daniels-Midland and friends?

    Just curious.

    Posted by Mask at 02/27/2008 @ 4:22pm

  2. CHEN: ....it'd be a much more charitable gesture for the U.S. to step up what it buys locally--where it's needed.

    I have a silly question! If they are growing the food needed by the hungry "locally", why the hell do they need our help???!!!

    I have no problem w/requiring foreign aid be mostly American sourced.....many countries have same! As for wiring funds abroad and buy the needed stuff closer to where it's needed and transport costs are lower, this is where corruption invariably will take some big bites! One solution is simply help out in our own hemisphere, have China & Japan handle Asia, Europe w/Africa and Russia w/the Mid East.

    Posted by Happy at 02/27/2008 @ 9:53pm

Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

John Murtha: The Old Soldier Who Said "Bring the Troops Home" | His Iraq War debate with Dick Cheney highlighted the difference between the modern era's sunshine patriots and winter soldiers.
John Nichols
36 Comments
Posted at 3:53 PM ET

» Act Now!

Demand Question Time | Join the call for the President and Congress to implement regular Question Time sessions.
Peter Rothberg
20 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Bad to Worse in Iraq | US influence is declining, and Iran's is rising.
Robert Dreyfuss
56 Comments

» The Notion

Who Dat? Dat’s the Super Bowl Champs! | The New Orleans Saints are the Super Bowl Champs and the city is feeling fearless.
Dave Zirin
30 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Welcome to Palinland | Though Sarah Palin's National Tea Party Convention keynote garnered applause when she invoked Ronald Reagan, the real sage behind her speech was Barry Goldwater.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
163 Comments

» And Another Thing

How to Counterbalance Focus on the Family on Superbowl Sunday | Give to help low income girls and women.
Katha Pollitt
21 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | James O'Keefe and Alter-reviews.
Eric Alterman